Rechercher dans ce blog

Monday, August 31, 2020

Samsung's B2B Surge: 5 Takeaways From Channel Chief Mike Coleman - CRN: Technology news for channel partners and solution providers

samsung.indah.link

Samsung is continuing to drive strong revenue growth through its U.S. mobility channel program as the company expands its work with partners and releases business-friendly devices at a steady clip, Samsung’s mobile channel chief told CRN.

The latest Samsung devices to launch with big potential for mobility solution providers are the Galaxy Note 20 and Note 20 Ultra, which feature a wide range of features aimed at workers.

[Related: Samsung Galaxy Note 20 And Note 20 Ultra: 10 Big Features]

Mike Coleman, vice president and mobility channel chief at Samsung Electronics America, spoke recently with CRN about the growth of the company’s channel efforts, key verticals for Samsung’s B2B devices and key business capabilities of the Galaxy Note 20.

“It’s one of many B2B tools that are part of the lineup now,” Coleman said. “The Note 20 is becoming more and more business-centric.”

What follows are five key comments from the interview with Coleman.

B2B Growth

“We are on track to just about double the business again this year--despite all of the COVID-related challenges. The business is really doing well. We came off of a really strong first half, and our second half is shaping up to be very promising. Our pipeline looks really good.

I think there’s a tremendous opportunity for partners that may or may not have focused on a mobility strategy. And when I say mobility, that can be a laptop, a Chromebook, a tablet, a wearable, a phone--a device that solves a problem. It is not simply a personal device, it’s really a tool for work.”

Channel Expansion

“We have also increased the size of the [U.S. mobility channel] team about 30 percent. We keep adding people to the team. We’re going after deeper coverage for the NSPs as we call them--CDW, Insight, Connection and such. We’re adding more folks to distribution--because as our business grows, we need more and more focus on the distro, Tier 1 side. And then we’re also expanding the geo coverage, for the geographically dispersed partners. So it’s really exciting, where we’re actually growing on all fronts.”

Key Verticals

“We’ve seen some very large wins in healthcare, transportation, logistics, education. The Chromebook business is off the charts in terms of growth. That business is a rocket for us. And that’s obviously education-focused. We’ve seen good solutioning on transport fleet management. Everybody’s at home, but they’re ordering stuff. So the trucking and transportation business has been growing rapidly, and we’ve partnered with quite a few different resellers in that space to equip fleets with the Galaxy Tab Active2, for example--with the ruggedized tablets and solutioning for ELD tracking. We’ve had some really big wins with some healthcare providers on the phones to track diabetes or blood pressure or things of that nature--where we’re able to use the devices in partnership with resellers and ISVs to manage healthcare applications.”

Galaxy Note 20 For Business

“If it’s going to be used as a business device, it has to have an amazing battery and have really good performance. So we’ve done that. We’ve loaded it with the Knox security features so that remote employees are protected. The S Pen is really cool now--the latency is significantly reduced. We’ve synced up with Microsoft and Cisco--we’ve optimized it for Microsoft 365 / Teams and for Webex.

DeX has been a big point of interest for a lot of resellers, because now you can [more easily] transition between mobile and desktop. So for example, you can connect the Note 20 to a monitor or even a Smart TV--which is really interesting, because every boardroom now has Smart TVs. So you can wirelessly connect and present--when we go back to the office--or even using your TV at home, you can use that as a monitor, if you wanted to. It’s obviously 5G equipped and enabled. And so those are some of the things we’re finding companies are really interested in, in terms of equipping their employees with a device for business use.”

Recruiting Partners

“We’re looking to recruit new partners, which we’ve continued to do. We’re working closely with our distributors to identify partners that have an interest in mobility. So we’re actively recruiting new resellers--and we’re obviously working with resellers that have been with us for quite some time to help them deliver more solutions, and to generate more revenue and more profit.”

The Link Lonk


August 31, 2020 at 11:42PM
https://ift.tt/32HUhoT

Samsung's B2B Surge: 5 Takeaways From Channel Chief Mike Coleman - CRN: Technology news for channel partners and solution providers

https://ift.tt/31VSHRH
Samsung

Samsung 980 PRO Briefly Listed Online - AnandTech

samsung.indah.link

In what seems to be an accidental leak, a product page for the highly-awaited Samsung 980 PRO SSD was posted and later taken down from Samsung's website for Singapore. The 980 PRO was first previewed in January at CES as their first consumer SSD to support PCIe 4.0, but with very little technical information. No release date was announced but Samsung's PR said to expect more information in Q2.

The timing of this leak is unsurprising: if Samsung was planning for a Q2 or early Q3 release before COVID-19 hit, it makes sense for them to be preparing for a release in the near future. However, this leak brings a few surprise about what kind of product the 980 PRO will be. Since this wasn't an official, coordinated announcement, the specifications revealed may not be final and we still have no indication of pricing or launch date. But the big surprise is that the 980 PRO will apparently be using TLC NAND, a first for Samsung's PRO models. Samsung has been the last holdout offering high-end MLC-based SSDs while the rest of the SSD industry has moved on to TLC (and QLC), for both consumer and enterprise markets. Samsung provided an early indication that they may finally be abandoning MLC NAND in early 2019 when the TLC-based 970 EVO was replaced with the 970 EVO Plus, a refresh that switched from 64L to 92L TLC. There was never any sign of a corresponding 970 PRO Plus model in the works.

The switch from MLC to TLC means the rated write endurance of the 980 PRO will be half that of the 970 PRO and equivalent to the TLC-based 970 EVO and EVO Plus. The upside is that the 980 PRO may be more competitively priced against other high-end consumer NVMe SSDs. It's also quite possible that Samsung needed to introduce SLC caching in order to hit the 5GB/s write speeds they're promising for the 980 PRO.

Samsung High-End NVMe SSD Comparison
Model 980 PRO 970 PRO 970 EVO Plus
Capacities 250 GB
500 GB
1000 GB

512 GB
1024 GB
250 GB
500 GB
1000 GB
2000 GB
Interface PCIe 4 x4
NVMe 1.3
PCIe 3 x4
NVMe 1.3
PCIe 3 x4
NVMe 1.3
Form Factor M.2 2280 Single-sided
Controller Samsung Elpis Samsung Phoenix Samsung Phoenix
NAND 3D TLC 64L MLC 92L TLC
SLC Write Caching Yes No Yes
Specifications below are for 1TB models specifically
Sequential Read 7000 MB/s 3500 MB/s 3500 MB/s
Sequential Write 5000 MB/s (SLC)
2000 MB/s (TLC)
2700 MB/s 3300 MB/s (SLC)
1700 MB/s (TLC)
Random Read 
(4kB)
QD1 22k IOPS 15k IOPS 19k IOPS
Max 1M IOPS 500k IOPS 600k IOPS
Random Write
(4kB)
QD1 60k IOPS 55k IOPS 60k IOPS
Max 1M IOPS 500k IOPS 550k IOPS (SLC)
400k IOPS (TLC)
Active Power 6.2 W (Average)
8.9 W (Burst)
5.2 W (Read)
5.7 W (Write)
5.5 W (Read)
6.0 W (Write)
Write Endurance 600 TB
0.3 DWPD
1200 TB
0.66 DWPD
600 TB
0.3 DWPD
Warranty 5 years 5 years 5 years
Launch Date 2020? May 2018 January 2019
Launch MSRP TBD $629.99
(62¢/GB)
$249.99
(25¢/GB)

The product page for the 980 PRO indicated that sequential read speed is now planned to be 7 GB/s, an improvement over the 6.5 GB/s listed earlier this year at CES. We also get our first look at random IO specifications, with the 1TB model hitting a maximum of 1M IOPS for either reads or writes. Performance at a queue depth of 1 is slightly improved over the 970 PRO and 970 EVO Plus, and post-cache sequential write speeds are also up from the 970 EVO Plus. This points to the 980 PRO as likely using Samsung's 1xx-layer 3D TLC rather than the 92L used in the 970 EVO Plus.

Power consumption from the 980 PRO is unsurprisingly higher than its predecessors, with the spec sheet showing 6.2W average and 8.9W in "burst mode". Samsung's high-end NVMe SSDs have already been fairly power-hungry, and making use of PCIe 4.0 speeds requires even more power. However, the 980 PRO should bring a substantial improvement in efficiency, because peak performance is doubling but power draw is not increasing by anywhere near that much. Samsung is likely following the same strategy as most other SSD controller designers by moving to a much newer fabrication process as part of the PCIe 4.0 transition.

The capacity options for the 980 PRO are a bit odd. The 970 PRO was offered in 512GB and 1TB capacities, and a 2TB capacity was hinted at but never made it to market. The lack of a 256GB option made some sense as that low capacity would likely not have been able to offer "PRO"-level performance. The 980 PRO moves to Samsung's typical TLC capacities: 250GB, 500GB, 1TB, but still omits the 2TB option that has been available from the EVOs. It seems likely that a 2TB 980 PRO model would be released at a later date.


Moving the 980 PRO to TLC NAND raises big questions for what to expect from a 980 EVO. Moving it to QLC NAND might be a bit premature, and would definitely be a big step down for that product line even if it added PCIe 4.0 support. My expectation is that any 980 EVO would more likely be a lower-performance, lower-power mainstream TLC drive, possibly without PCIe 4.0 support. Or to put it another way, an answer to the SK hynix Gold P31, which we think represents the direction the mainstream NVMe market segment is moving towards.

The Link Lonk


September 01, 2020 at 02:00AM
https://ift.tt/3gKWODQ

Samsung 980 PRO Briefly Listed Online - AnandTech

https://ift.tt/31VSHRH
Samsung

Samsung’s latest midrange phone has a whopping 7,000mAh battery - The Verge

samsung.indah.link

Samsung has opened up preorders for the Galaxy M51 in Germany, officially confirming that its latest midrange phone has an absolutely massive 7,000mAh battery. It costs €360.01 (about $429), and Samsung’s site says that it expects the phone to start shipping on September 11th. There’s no sign of preorder pages on Samsung’s other regional stores just yet, but a release in India seems likely given that Samsung teased the phone there last week.

At 7,000mAh, it isn’t the biggest phone battery we’ve ever seen. Last year, for example, Avenir Telecom showed off an Energizer-branded smartphone containing a bulbous 18,000mAh battery. But it’s almost unheard of in devices from mass-market manufacturers like Samsung, and we’ll be interested to see what effect it has on the overall size and weight of the handset when it releases.

Aside from its battery, the Galaxy M51 has a more typical set of specs for a phone of its price. It has a 6.7-inch OLED screen with a central hole-punch notch for its 32-megapixel selfie camera. Around the back there are four rear-facing cameras, a 64-megapixel main camera, a 12-megapixel ultrawide with a 123-degree field of view, and 5-megapixel macro and depth-sensing cameras. It’s got 6GB of RAM, 128GB of internal storage, and Samsung says it’s powered by an “octa-core processor,” which GSMArena notes is thought to be a Snapdragon 730.

At €360.01, the Galaxy M51 has a very similar asking price to the Galaxy A51 in Germany, but it sounds like it might be the better option if you absolutely need every hour of battery life.

The Link Lonk


August 31, 2020 at 07:24PM
https://ift.tt/32FQTL9

Samsung’s latest midrange phone has a whopping 7,000mAh battery - The Verge

https://ift.tt/31VSHRH
Samsung

Forget $1,000 smartphones — here are 3 options for under $400 from Apple, Google, Samsung - Courier Journal

samsung.indah.link

The most recent top of the line smartphone release from Samsung has an opening list price of $1,300 and most reviews, mine included, could be summed up in a few words. Great phone, but so expensive? Now, during a pandemic, when millions have been thrown out of work? 

This really comes to home when you consider that there are three fantastic smartphones out now for $400 or less: The Samsung Galaxy A51 and Apple iPhone SE will cost you $399, while the Google Pixel 4A is just $350. 

And they are clearly the best bargain-priced phones I've ever seen. Unless you need the latest camera technology with multiple lenses, there is no reason for most consumers to spend more on a phone. You won't be missing out.

If Zoom's out, what else is there?: We tried WebEx, Google Meet, Skype and more. Here's what we found

Coronavirus pandemic: Wi-Fi woes are even worse now, and only some of us can do anything about it

All are worth your attention if you're looking for a replacement phone, or a new model for the kids. Meanwhile, new phones are scheduled to be released in a few weeks from Google (a new Pixel) and Apple (several models of iPhones) and are expected to cost way more than $400. So how do the budget phones compare?

Samsung Galaxy A51

The biggest of the phones is a $399 bargain, with a beautiful 6.5-inch screen the size of the $1,099 iPhone Pro Max, and even larger than the $999 6.2-inch Samsung Galaxy S20. . You get a second lens with the camera, which the rivals don't have. And while that's a plus, Samsung tends to over-saturate your photos, so if that's a problem, and you want to remain in the Android family, you'll want to look at the Pixel 4A.

Google Pixel 4A

The best bargain in smartphone land, at $349, the Google phone is an Android flagship with a 5.8-inch screen, fast processor, and a terrific one-lens camera that can take some pretty amazing night photos in the dark. Plus there are add-ons like the ability to add live captions to both homemade videos and ones you watch on YouTube, and an instant transcription service using Google's voice recording app. The Pixel 4A is clearly the best Pixel phone Google has made, one so good, I think if the line had launched with this model, Google would have been able to turn Pixel into a mass market brand. Google's market share is under 1%, while most phones sold in the United States are from Apple and Samsung.

Apple iPhone SE

This is the Apple phone for those who didn't like bigger phones, with a 4.7-inch screen, and yearn for the classic iPhone, one with a Home button for navigation, Touch ID instead of Face ID, and a headphone jack. Apple's nod to modernity is a powerful A13 processor, the same one that's in the current top of the line iPhones. It's classic in every sense, but as powerful as the latest iPhone. If you prefer living in an iPhone world to Android, this is the phone for you.

Autoplay

Show Thumbnails

Show Captions

5G ... a concern?

None of these phones are compatible with the new, faster 5G networks. However, know that in our tests, true national 5G service that isn't spotty or as fast as advertised is still at least a year away, if not longer. So you won't be missing anything now by waiting.

Decisions, decisions

Which one is best for you? It depends whether you prefer Android or iPhone. I'd choose the Pixel 4A over the Galaxy because I'm not a fan of Samsung bloatware or the somewhat over-saturation of photos, (notice how the oranges below are "orange orange" in the words of the old Trix rabbit, compared to just orange on the Pixel and iPhone) but these are minor quibbles. I could easily live with either.

On a specs basic, you'd have to go with the A51, for the bigger screen and second camera lens. But if money's tight, the Pixel 4A is fantastic. As is the SE. You couldn't go wrong with any of these phones.

Readers: if you had to take one of these phones to a desert island, which one would you select?

Follow USA TODAY's Jefferson Graham (@jeffersongraham) on Twitter

Read or Share this story: https://ift.tt/3hLa9gP

The Link Lonk


August 31, 2020 at 07:25PM
https://ift.tt/3hLa9gP

Forget $1,000 smartphones — here are 3 options for under $400 from Apple, Google, Samsung - Courier Journal

https://ift.tt/31VSHRH
Samsung

Galaxy Note 20 ongoing review: Here's how Samsung's $1,000 phone stacks up so far - CNET

samsung.indah.link
note20-mysticgreen

Samsung's Galaxy Note 20 in mystic green.

Jessica Dolcourt/CNET

I was excited to unwrap Samsung's Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, a supercharged $1,300 flagship phone that gives the Galaxy Note 10 line a significant upgrade, for a price. But in some ways, I've anticipated the standard, cheaper Galaxy Note 20 even more. Retailing for $1,000, it slashes $300 off the price, while serving up the same core features and skimming back the extras across the board, including screen technology, camera specs, build material and RAM (scroll to the end for the full specs comparison).


Order from AmazonSamsung | Verizon | AT&T | Xfinity MobileT-Mobile | US CellularBest Buy | Walmart | Sam's Club |


What makes the Note 20 such an interesting device is that it has to win you over as a phone in its own right, but also convince you its trade-offs don't make it feel like a diet Note 20 Ultra. There's also the Galaxy S20 Plus to compare it to as well and I'll get there eventually. I'll keep updating this post as new observations develop, just understand that my opinion could change as the experience all comes together -- and that's a good thing.

Newest Galaxy Note 20 impressions 

  • The Note 20 feels good as a standalone phone, but is overshadowed by the Note 20 Ultra.
  • A flat screen brings certain advantages compared to the Ultra's curved screen, though the bezels are still whisper thin and the phone does have issues with "accidental presses" when I hold it. For example, it fast-forwarded in 10 second increments while I held the phone and watched a Netflix show.
  • Anyone used to a 120Hz screen refresh rate will note that the Note 20 feels "slow" when scrolling.
  • Battery life seems at least on par with the Note 20 Ultra, if not better -- likely a result of the standard 60Hz screen refresh rate. 
  • It still towers out of my pockets and fills my hand, but feels less treacherous and less top-heavy.

Note 20's plastic backing feels cheaper, but lighter

One major -- and very obvious -- difference between the Note 20 Ultra and standard Note 20 is the backing. You get Gorilla Glass Victus on the back of the Note 20 Ultra and a polycarbonate (that means plastic) backing on the Note 20. This may not seem like a big deal, but Samsung and other high-end smartphone makers are perhaps victims of their own success, training consumers that glass is classy and sophisticated, while plastic, a typically less shatter-prone material, is now seen as less refined.

Samsung sent along my first-choice Note 20 finish, the mystic green color, which is a beautiful, shimmery green with blue undertones in the right light. It looks downright satiny. However, $1,000 still seems like a lot to pay for a phone with a plastic backing, even when you slap on a case. Side by side with the Note 20 Ultra, the Note 20 looks and feels midrange, which doesn't line up with the asking price. 

Now playing: Watch this: Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a do-everything device that'll...

12:47

Here's another issue. I also noticed that the corners snag my fingertips as I hold the device without a cover. It isn't painful or disruptive, but it doesn't feel as luxe as a $1,000 phone should. Samsung was gracious enough to include a few cases, which makes the problem disappear, but it's important to try the phone both ways.

There is one advantage, though. The Note 20 is significantly lighter than the Note 20 Ultra, in hand, in my pocket and in my purse. It's much easier to hold when writing, watching videos for an extended time and just carrying around. That's a real plus for me.

Camera: Note 20 vs. Note 20 Ultra

Galaxy Note 20 Galaxy Note 20 Ultra
Main camera 12-megapixel (f1.8, Dual Pixel AF, OIS, 1.8ÎŒm, 79-degree FOV, 1/1.76-inch image sensor) 108-megapixel (f1.8, OIS, 0.8ÎŒm, 79-degree FOV, 1/1.33-inch image sensor)
Ultra-wide angle 12-megapixel (f2.2, 1.4ÎŒm, 120-degree FOV) 12-megapixel (f2.2, 1.4ÎŒm, 120-degree FOV)
Telephoto 64-megapixel (f2.0, 0.8ÎŒm, 76-degree FOV) 12-megapixel (f3.0, 1.0ÎŒm, 20-degree FOV)
Front-facing camera 10-megapixel (f2.2, 1.22ÎŒm, 80-degree FOV) 10-megapixel (f2.2, 1.22ÎŒm, 80-degree FOV)
Zoom 3x hybrid 5x optical
Super Zoom 30x 50x
Laser auto-focus sensor No Yes
Video capture 8K 8K

How about that Note 20 camera? Differences matter

After two weeks with the Note 20 Ultra, photos on the Galaxy Note 20 are comparatively good, but the Ultra's 5x optical zoom and laser autofocus give it all the advantage. Images are still colorful and sharp on their own and it's nice that the Note 20 lacks the Ultra's enormous, awkward camera bump. As a result, writing on the Note 20 with the S Pen made it rock much less deeply (without a cover) than the Ultra.

When trying to shoot nature shots out on a day trip to the coast and around my neighborhood, however, I missed shots more frequently on the Note 20, and the 3x optical zoom and 30x AI zoom photos I took didn't excite me compared to the Ultra's 5x optical and 50x digital zoom. I was less bothered by the pared-back detail capture (64 megapixels at the high end instead of 108 megapixels). 

Although I don't usually use extreme zoom in everyday situations, watching a hawk tear into a snack in the branches high above, or trying to capture a seal hauling itself out of the ocean were two inspiring exceptions. Enough to definitely buy the $1,300 Note Ultra instead? Maybe not, but there is a discernible camera difference.

For all the bulbous faults of its protruding camera array, the Note 20 Ultra's enhanced photography got me closer to nature than the Note 20 and looked less grainy in the process. After a while, I stopped reaching for the Note 20 altogether. 

I could still share the Note 20 pictures and videos with my birder and nature-loving friend -- who I knew would flip for them regardless -- and the photos are still effective and usable. But side by side, it's obvious where Samsung made its investments.

Coming up: Screen quality, battery life, storage, more

This is just the beginning of my Note-versus-Note Ultra testing period. Screen specs, battery life and a lot of minor features will go head to head to determine which phone provides the best value for the money. Right now it's anyone's to lose. And I'll find out if there are other factors that could push one above the other, or above competing devices. Keep checking in as this review-in-progress evolves. Meanwhile, brush up on the full specs comparison below.

Note 20 versus Note 20 Ultra


Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra
Display size, resolution 6.7-inch; 2,400x1,080 pixels 6.9-inch; 3,088x1,440 pixels
Pixel density 393 ppi 496 ppi
Dimensions (Inches) 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 in 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.31 in
Dimensions (Millimeters) 161.6 x 75.2 x 8.3 mm 164.8 x 77.2 x 8.1mm
Weight (Ounces, Grams) 6.84 oz, 194g 7.33 oz, 208g
Mobile software Android 10 Android 10
Camera 12-megapixel (ultra-wide), 12-megapixel (wide-angle), 64-megapixel (telephoto) 12-megapixel (ultra-wide), 108-megapixel (wide-angle), 12-megapixel (telephoto)
Front-facing camera 10-megapixel 10-megapixel
Video capture 8K 8K
Processor Snapdragon 865 Plus Snapdragon 865 Plus
Storage 128GB 128GB, 512GB
RAM 8GB 12GB
Expandable storage No Up to 1TB
Battery 4,300 mAh 4,500 mAh
Fingerprint sensor In-screen In-screen
Connector USB-C USB-C
Headphone jack No No
Special features S Pen stylus; 5G connectivity; Wireless PowerShare; water resistant (IP68) 5x optical zoom, UWB sharing, S Pen stylus; 5G connectivity; Wireless PowerShare; water resistant (IP68)
Price off-contract (USD) $1,000 $1,300 (128GB), $1,450 (512GB)
Price (GBP) £849 (4G) and £949 (5G) £1,179
Price (AUD) AU$1,499 (4G) and AU$1,649 (5G) AU$1,849 (4G) and $AU$1,999 (5G)
The Link Lonk


August 31, 2020 at 03:00PM
https://ift.tt/3lvQmnH

Galaxy Note 20 ongoing review: Here's how Samsung's $1,000 phone stacks up so far - CNET

https://ift.tt/31VSHRH
Samsung

Samsung Is Mass Producing Even Faster 16GB Memory Modules for Phones - PCMag

samsung.indah.link
(Photo: Samsung)

Back in February, Samsung started mass producing very fast 10nm 16GB modules of LPDDR5 mobile DRAM chips. This week, those chips now look slow thanks to Samsung's move to a third-generation production line using extreme ultraviolet (EUV) technology.

Samsung announced that it's now mass producing the memory industry's first 16Gb LPDDR5 mobile DRAM modules using EUV on the world's largest semiconductor line. The modules are being manufactured on a second production line in Pyeongtaek, Korea. Line 2 spans an area the size of 16 soccer fields (over 1.3 million square feet) and uses Samsung's most advanced (1z) process node to produce the 10nm chips.

Samsung's Pyeongtaek, Korea plant for LPDDR5 production
(Photo: Samsung)

Samsung already offered the fastest 16GB memory modules for phones, which when introduced in February boasted 5,500MB/s data transfer speeds. However, the third-generation chips boast a 16 percent performance gain and run at 6,400Mb/s. Samsung says that's fast enough to transfer over 50GB of data in a second. Not only that, but the 1z process means the LPDDR5 chip package is 30 percent thinner, giving smartphone and tablet manufacturers a bit more space to play with inside their already very cramped devices.

With such a huge production line already churning out these new chips, Samsung is confident they will appear in many flagship mobile devices next year. However, such is the scale of production, Samsung is also targeting the automotive industry and intends to produce LPDDR5 chips that meet strict operating temperature and reliability standards required for their use in vehicles.

Further Reading

Component Reviews

Component Best Picks

The Link Lonk


August 31, 2020 at 06:06PM
https://ift.tt/2EMAoVA

Samsung Is Mass Producing Even Faster 16GB Memory Modules for Phones - PCMag

https://ift.tt/31VSHRH
Samsung

Endangered Animals toys repurposed from Samsung Eco-Package boxes - Dezeen

samsung.indah.link

In this video, Dezeen x Samsung Out of the Box Competition finalist Sarah Willemart explains how she created a series of animal companions from Samsung television boxes.

The toys, which Willemart designed together with Matthieu Muller, are called Endangered Animals and intended to help parents teach their children about declining biodiversity.

There are three animal designs, a polar bear, a black rhinoceros and a sea turtle, which can be made from boxes for Samsung's The Sero, The Serif and The Frame televisions.

When children are not playing with the toys, they can be used around the home as decorative pieces of furniture.

The concept is one of five finalists in the Dezeen x Samsung Out of the Box Competition to create innovative household objects by repurposing cardboard packaging.

The contest draws on Samsung's Eco-Package concept, which aims to reduce waste by providing customers with a way to repurpose their television packaging into new household items.

The finalists were selected from 15 shortlisted designs, which included a planter, a sneaker rack and even an amplifier for mobile phones.

The Link Lonk


August 31, 2020 at 05:00PM
https://ift.tt/2YRGJGh

Endangered Animals toys repurposed from Samsung Eco-Package boxes - Dezeen

https://ift.tt/31VSHRH
Samsung

Sunday, August 30, 2020

Forget $1,000 smartphones — here are three great options for under $400 from Apple, Google and Samsung - USA TODAY

samsung.indah.link
CLOSE

Autoplay

Show Thumbnails

Show Captions

The most recent top of the line smartphone release from Samsung has an opening list price of $1,300 and most reviews, mine included, could be summed up in a few words. Great phone, but so expensive? Now, during a pandemic, when millions have been thrown out of work?

This really comes to home when you consider that there are three fantastic smartphones out now for $400 or less: The Samsung Galaxy A71 and Apple iPhone SE will cost you $399, while the Google Pixel 4A is just $350. 

And they are clearly the best bargain-priced phones I've ever seen. Unless you need the latest camera technology with multiple lenses, there is no reason for most consumers to spend more on a phone. You won't be missing out.

If Zoom's out, what else is there?: We tried WebEx, Google Meet, Skype and more. Here's what we found

Coronavirus pandemic: Wi-Fi woes are even worse now, and only some of us can do anything about it

All are worth your attention if you're looking for a replacement phone, or a new model for the kids. Meanwhile, new phones are scheduled to be released in a few weeks from Google (a new Pixel) and Apple (several models of iPhones) and are expected to cost way more than $400. So how do the budget phones compare?

Samsung Galaxy A71

The biggest of the phones is a $399 bargain, with a beautiful 6.5-inch screen the size of the $1,099 iPhone Pro Max, and even larger than the $999 6.2-inch Samsung Galaxy S20. . You get a second lens with the camera, which the rivals don't have. And while that's a plus, Samsung tends to over-saturate your photos, so if that's a problem, and you want to remain in the Android family, you'll want to look at the Pixel 4A. Both the A71 and the Pixel 4A have the same Qualcomm SnapDragon 730G processor.

Google Pixel 4A

The best bargain in smartphone land, at $349, the Google phone is an Android flagship with a 5.8-inch screen, fast processor, and a terrific one-lens camera that can take some pretty amazing night photos in the dark. Plus there are add-ons like the ability to add live captions to both homemade videos and ones you watch on YouTube, and an instant transcription service using Google's voice recording app. The Pixel 4A is clearly the best Pixel phone Google has made, one so good, I think if the line had launched with this model, Google would have been able to turn Pixel into a mass market brand. Google's market share is under 1%, while most phones sold in the United States are from Apple and Samsung.

Apple iPhone SE

This is the Apple phone for those who didn't like bigger phones, with a 4.7-inch screen, and yearn for the classic iPhone, one with a Home button for navigation, Touch ID instead of Face ID, and a headphone jack. Apple's nod to modernity is a powerful A13 processor, the same one that's in the current top of the line iPhones. It's classic in every sense, but as powerful as the latest iPhone. If you prefer living in an iPhone world to Android, this is the phone for you.

Autoplay

Show Thumbnails

Show Captions

5G ... a concern?

None of these phones are compatible with the new, faster 5G networks. However, know that in our tests, true national 5G service that isn't spotty or as fast as advertised is still at least a year away, if not longer. So you won't be missing anything now by waiting. If you're in a rush, the 5G version of the A71 is available for $599.

Decisions, decisions

Which one is best for you? It depends whether you prefer Android or iPhone. I'd choose the Pixel 4A over the Galaxy because I'm not a fan of Samsung bloatware or the somewhat over-saturation of photos, (notice how the oranges below are "orange orange" in the words of the old Trix rabbit, compared to just orange on the Pixel and iPhone) but these are minor quibbles. I could easily live with either.

On a specs basic, you'd have to go with the A71, for the bigger screen and second camera lens. But if money's tight, the Pixel 4A is fantastic. As is the SE. You couldn't go wrong with any of these phones.

Readers: if you had to take one of these phones to a desert island, which one would you select?

Follow USA TODAY's Jefferson Graham (@jeffersongraham) on Twitter

Read or Share this story: https://ift.tt/3lygONp

The Link Lonk


August 30, 2020 at 06:01PM
https://ift.tt/3lygONp

Forget $1,000 smartphones — here are three great options for under $400 from Apple, Google and Samsung - USA TODAY

https://ift.tt/31VSHRH
Samsung

Samsung teases premium Thom Browne Edition of the Galaxy Z Fold 2 - Engadget

samsung.indah.link

As you might imagine, though, the combination of a fashion imprint and the extras could easily make this one of the most expensive Samsung phones to date. The Thom Browne Galaxy Z Flip cost $2,480 when new, or well over the $1,380 price of the standard Z Flip. With the Z Fold 2 likely to carry a considerably higher starting price (the original Galaxy Fold was $1,980), there’s a real chance its Browne counterpart could crack the $3,000 mark — this really will be for the wealthy and style-conscious.

The Link Lonk


August 31, 2020 at 01:04AM
https://ift.tt/3gJ2dLI

Samsung teases premium Thom Browne Edition of the Galaxy Z Fold 2 - Engadget

https://ift.tt/31VSHRH
Samsung

Huawei Fallout—Serious New China Threat Strikes At Samsung And Apple - Forbes

samsung.indah.link

From adversity comes opportunity, they say, and that thought will be weighing on the minds of Huawei execs in Shenzhen right now—because their adversity is quickly opening doors for others, and there’s no guarantee there will ever be a return to business as usual. We are still reeling from the devastating escalation in U.S. sanctions against Huawei, announced last week, but some of the ramifications are now starting to become clearer. Right now there’s no obvious escape route for China’s leading tech player, and others are circling.

Ahead of Trump’s blacklist, Huawei had overtaken Apple for global smartphone sales and was on course to overtake Samsung as well. Despite the blacklist, Huawei kept ahold of the world’s number two slot and did actually overtake Samsung in the second quarter this year, as the market reeled from the impact of coronavirus. But that will not last—the latest set of U.S. sanctions will heavily impact Huawei sales next year. But, putting Huawei to one side, Apple and Samsung now have a new China threat striking at their otherwise duopolistic dominance of global sales.

I’ve singled out Xiaomi before as the real beneficiary from Huawei’s decline in key overseas markets—especially in Europe. The domestic rival to Huawei remarkably bettered Huawei sales in Europe for the first time in the second quarter this year, growing revenues 65% as Huawei shrunk 17%. Xiaomi moved up to third place behind Samsung and Apple—Huawei dropped to fourth.

Recommended For You

That gloomy picture for Huawei is now much worse. In its second-quarter results, issued this week, Xiaomi may have reported modest annual revenue growth (up 3.1%), but it was all about the detail. Xiaomi’s export markets have recovered to pre-coronavirus levels, with a major boost in higher-end smartphone sales—the exact segment where it needs to unseat Huawei. According to Xiaomi, “in overseas markets, shipments of our premium smartphones with a retail price of €300 or more went up by 99.2% year-over-year.”

The manufacturer—which has built its brand in the budget segment, has been upping its game to take Huawei market share outside China, replicating its larger rival’s lower priced / higher quality strategy to tackle aspirational markets in Europe in particular. This was the battleground where Huawei made its name as an export giant. Xiaomi’s strategy is clear—become the new Huawei. Industry analysts suggest Xiaomi is now on course to become one of the top-three global smartphone makers, overtaking Apple and ultimately targeting Samsung—if it can genuinely execute a new Huawei strategy.

MORE FROM FORBESHuawei Stunned By Trump Strike-Here's What That Means For 600 Million Users

Those second quarter Europe numbers darkened Huawei’s celebrations on overtaking Samsung for global smartphone sales for the same quarter—a result driven by Huawei’s lock on its domestic market as Samsung recovered from the Covid-19 sales hits in other markets. It was always going to be short-lived. And that was all before Trump signalled a seismic shock to Huawei Smartphone sales from next year, denying the company access to the high-end chipsets it needs to power its flagship devices, to compete with other market-leaders.

Xiaomi has no such restrictions—and it still offers non-Chinese customers the full-fat Android experience, without the loss of Google software and services that had already hit Huawei so hard before the latest ramp-up in U.S. action.

“Our overseas business achieved robust growth against market headwinds and obtained remarkable results across key markets,” Xiaomi said in its results announcement. “Our smartphone shipments in the European market grew by 64.9% year-over-year, attaining a top three position in terms of market share for the first time.”

Of Huawei’s domestic rivals, Xiaomi was the one to recognise the staggering opportunity to fill the vacuum that Huawei would leave in overseas markets. Until this month, that was all about Google. Predicting that non-Chinese consumers would be reluctant to shift from full-fat Android to a new, Huawei alternative without their staples, Xiaomi plugged the gap. It had already proven its mettle in India, where it leads the market. It’s now picking up millions of Huawei users in Europe and elsewhere.

MORE FROM FORBESWhy Google And YouTube Are Now China's Most Wanted

Huawei’s future as a premium smartphone brand is uncertain—at least in the short to medium term. That will throw open the Chinese market and threaten Huawei’s lock. But in China, Xiaomi has Oppo and Vivo to contend with—the playing field is fairly level. Overseas, though, Xiaomi has been honing its approach. It’s nicely primed.

And so watch with interest over the next 2-3 quarters’ results—will Xiaomi continue to grow strongly in Europe and how much further will Huawei decline as its next flagship—the Mate 40—also launches absent Google and the pre-blacklist P30 gets that little bit older?

And then to next year, where at some point—perhaps fairly early—Huawei will exhaust its stockpile of chipsets, which will then heavily impact its ability to ship devices, both domestically and to export markets. If Xiaomi can position itself as the leading value for money premium device, then it has the chance to accelerate that growth and to expand its footprint into other markets. Huawei leveraged its strategy to break-up the Samsung and Apple market lock and there’s no reason Xiaomi cannot pick up where it’s larger domestic rival left off. If anything, the ground has been cleared and it will be easier this time around.

“Looking forward to the next decade,” Xiaomi told me in a statement, “we will firmly adhere to our ‘three guiding principles’ – never cease to explore and innovate, continue to offer products with strong price-to-performance ratio, and seek to make the coolest products, so as to let everyone in the world enjoy a better life.” Heavily funded R&D fueling cool products at the right price-performance-ratio—precisely what Huawei managed so successfully.

Meanwhile, we await some insight from Huawei as to what its chipset mitigation strategy is likely to be. The Huawei Developer Conference comes up next month—perhaps we will get some answers then.

The Link Lonk


August 30, 2020 at 04:48PM
https://ift.tt/31EzUJR

Huawei Fallout—Serious New China Threat Strikes At Samsung And Apple - Forbes

https://ift.tt/31VSHRH
Samsung

Should you buy the Samsung Galaxy Watch3 or the Fossil Gen 5? - Android Police

samsung.indah.link

Samsung's new smartwatch on the block is the Galaxy Watch3, featuring the company's latest hardware and software packed into a traditional-looking watch. However, at a starting price of $400 (with configurations that make it almost $500), it's not an impulse purchase. There's also the competition to consider, namely the Fossil Gen 5.

The Fossil Gen 5 is the flagship smartwatch for Google's Wear OS platform right now. Thanks to its Snapdragon Wear 3100 processor and 1GB RAM, it's faster (and less buggy) than most other Wear OS watches, and it's also significantly cheaper than the Galaxy Watch3. In this guide, we'll help you figure out which timepiece is the best choice for you.

Hardware: Ever so slightly different

At first glance, the Galaxy Watch3 and Fossil Gen 5 look fairly similar. They both resemble traditional watches, with large band lugs and multiple side buttons, and some of the internal hardware is even similar. Both models have 8GB of internal storage, 1GB RAM, a heart rate sensor, and NFC for tap-to-pay. They also share limited water/dust resistance, so you can take them for a short swim (or a hand wash) without worrying about hardware failures.

  Galaxy Watch3 Fossil Gen 5
Chipset Exynos 9110 Snapdragon Wear 3100
Storage 8GB 8GB
RAM 1GB 1GB
Dimensions 41mm: 41 x 42.5 x 11.3mm
45mm: 45 x 46.2 x 11.1mm
44 x 44 x 12mm
Display 41mm: 1.2" AMOLED 360x360
45mm: 1.4" AMOLED 360x360
1.28" AMOLED 416x416
Heart rate sensor Yes Yes
Electrocardiography (ECG) sensor Yes (coming to US in software update) No
Blood pressure monitor Yes (coming to US in software update) No
NFC (Tap-to-pay) Yes Yes
Water resistance 5ATM / IP68 3ATM
Software Tizen OS 5.5 Wear OS H
Price 41mm BT: $399
41mm LTE: $449
45mm BT: $429
45mm LTE: $480
$295

The greatest hardware difference between the two watches is the size — or more accurately, sizes. While the Fossil Gen 5 is only available in a single 44mm size, the Galaxy Watch3 comes in both 41mm and 45mm sizes. If you have small wrists, the 41mm Watch3 might be the best option.

Fossil Gen 5 (left) next to the 45mm Galaxy Watch3 (right)

The Galaxy Watch3 has more health sensors than the Fossil Gen 5, namely an Electrocardiograph (ECG) monitor and a blood pressure monitor, but there are catches to both. The ECG sensor was only recently approved for use in the United States, but as of when this article was written, Samsung hasn't rolled out the update to enable it. The blood pressure monitor hasn't even been approved by the FDA yet, and it requires calibration with a dedicated machine to get an initial reading.

Finally, the physical dials on both watches are different. The Fossil Gen 5 has a small dial on the right side, which you can twist to move up and down

Software: Watch3 wins

In the software department, the Galaxy Watch3 is the winner in almost every way. Samsung's own 'Tizen' operating system is more polished and actively-developed than Google's Wear OS platform. The interface is generally smoother, the applications are better-designed, and the phone companion app allows you to change many of the watch's settings without swiping through tiny menus.

Tizen 5.5 on the Galaxy Watch3

While both watches have the standard assortment of health features you would expect on a wearable, Samsung Health has more functionality than Google Fit, like better automatic workout detection. Even though Google Assistant on Wear OS technically offers more functionality than Bixby on the Galaxy Watch, Assistant sometimes has connection issues on the Fossil Gen 5.

Wear OS on the Fossil Gen 5

Even though Tizen is in a better place than Wear OS, the Fossil Gen 5 still covers all the basic smartwatch functionality. You can check notifications, track your heart rate throughout the day, install custom watch faces, control music playback, and use a handful of Google apps. Just like with Tizen, the library of third-party apps is lacking — it has been over a year since our last roundup of new Wear OS apps, simply because there aren't many being released.

Price: Fossil wins

While the Galaxy Watch3 may have the upper hand in software (and design, depending on who you ask), the Fossil Gen 5 wins in the price department. The Fossil watch typically goes for $295, and has gone on sale for as low as $169 in the past. That's significantly cheaper than the Galaxy Watch3, which starts at $399 for the 41mm Bluetooth/Wi-Fi model, and can cost as much as $479 if you want the larger 45mm version with LTE.

You'll have to decide for yourself if a $105+ price premium is worth it to get a better software experience. You might also be able to trade in an older device to get a discount on the Galaxy Watch3 — see our pricing and availability hub for more information.

Finally, be sure to check out our full reviews of the Fossil Gen 5 and Galaxy Watch3 for our full thoughts on each model.

Where to buy the Samsung Galaxy Watch3

Where to buy the Fossil Gen 5

The Link Lonk


August 30, 2020 at 10:00PM
https://ift.tt/2QF1Lnc

Should you buy the Samsung Galaxy Watch3 or the Fossil Gen 5? - Android Police

https://ift.tt/31VSHRH
Samsung

Featured Post

EU extends investigation into Samsung's EV battery plant in Hungary - Reuters

samsung.indah.link BRUSSELS, June 29 (Reuters) - EU competition enforcers have extended a near two-year investigation into Hungarian state ...

Popular Posts